Painting Lesson Videos or A Live Local Instructor: What Is Better?

Due to the ease of use, availability and affordability they have gained in popularity over the last couple years. They are they better than learning in class from an actual instructor or is it more conventional? The article examines the positives and negatives of these two methods, while also providing some insight on the best way to learn the art. In the old, traditional approach to painting, enrolling in a local art class led by a master artist is better than attending university. Topics are sometimes limited because of time constraints. You could choose to specialize in a particular medium, topic or technique. The impressionism series, the outdoor scene and oil painting could all be covered in one course, check here.

Inconveniences associated with a local live instructor

There is no way this program can cover the many theories, styles, methods, and media that are needed to become a skilled and well-rounded artists. Most often, the class’s slowest students set the pace during live classes.

Finding an instructor that has both the ability and the experience to deliver a balanced course is like playing the lotto. It is unlikely that you can learn to paint more than a few works just by copying your instructor.

Driving to a classroom and carrying all of the necessary supplies is usually more costly than using video teaching at home.

Live local instruction has many benefits

Important is the feedback provided by your instructor. Even if we are learning something new, there is a chance that we will make a mistake and never realize it. Some students will get stuck, or may require some assistance to progress.

How can painting videos be a disadvantage?

The majority of video courses do not allow students to contact the instructors with questions, nor can they have their work reviewed by them. Publishers have allowed their students uploading artwork to online forums in some cases. Authors and students are able to provide any feedback.